net neutrality (2)

Net Neutrality And Freedom Lost

This subject shouldn’t be in the news in the year 2017, but seems the internet and its freedom, despite all the advancements it provides to business and general spreading of information, gets under attack from time to time, revealing scrupulous ways some business attempt to control and do… more business. In the end at the cost of the final consumer – us.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia:

“Net neutrality is the principle that Internet service providers and governments regulating the Internet must treat all data on the Internet the same, not discriminate or charge differentiated by user, content, website, platform, application, type of attached equipment, or mode of communication.“

Web companies like Comcast, Verizon, and AT&T are supposed to balance internet activity, not utilizing in their frameworks prohibitive programming, that can be used as weapons to smother out connections from web business associations that require a decent stream like Netflix or YouTube among numerous others.

Even your one backup tool online is going to suffer as soon you go beyond that “imaginary” limit.

net neutrality

Tech pioneers such as Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, approached the FCC to protect solid unhindered internet rules, and some pointed for the Congress to systematize a more innovative law. After all, seeing that all Americans can get on the web was a noteworthy FCC objective.

But it is among corporations and organizations that the problem gets ridiculously more serious: ISPs will be made guards of traffic flow, managing organizations at will and hindering new rivalry and future development.

They will throttle or generally meddle with web traffic, established by web companies like Google, Amazon, and Facebook that quest for internet fairness strategies like sharing.

Your ISP may level out certain sites that exploit a great deal of information and traffic, but sites that rely on individual amusement like photos and video sharing will get a considerable impact on their business model.

Are there are benefits?

There is the transfer speed issue. Not all like the open web that has made ready so much piracy in the form of illegal downloads and file sharing that rely on a speedy network. In fact, it uses most of your network speed to spread its own business.

The only advancement would be given at a stage where individuals who have been verifiably warned would have their traffic throttle down, or it would turn into a shutdown system where known suspicious links and blacklisted IP´s were blocked on application access.

This would have a huge effect. But… where to begin?

You hope to be connected with whatever site you need to visit. This is Net Neutrality that business visionaries have made flourish on the web, and no organization ought to be permitted to meddle with this open business-related ability.

The FCC received solid Net Neutrality rules in view of Title II of the Communications Act, while adversaries have done all that they can to obliterate Net Neutrality. With little care for the consumer that pays – Blocking or charging for additional traffic harms individuals and disregards a free internet.

Facebook, Google, Twitter and many different organizations, activists, and new companies stimulated the help of unhindered free internet on last Wednesday (12/07/2017) presumably trying to achieve more than 10 million ISP clients with their message.

Sites Amazon and Spotify are showing a banner on their pages requesting support while others like Netflix provide a link to the best way to contact the FCC.

While ISPs are for revoking unconstrained internet, a ton of tech experts is firmly fighting against it. Each of these organizations openly reports their official interest in the Battle for the Net.

Twitter had been most forceful, and tweeted its own approach vision – These companies will simply bond to their already good positions, and simply pulverize away future rivalry.


More information: